I am Clayton Kuehl. I have spent nearly three decades helping small aerospace organizations build quality management systems that actually work on the shop floor — and stay working after the registrar leaves.
Schedule a Free CallFree 30-minute introductory call — no pitch, no obligation
Three decades in aerospace quality management means you stop asking what could go wrong and start recognizing it before it does. I've built quality management systems from scratch for machine shops with five employees and scaled implementations for operations running seventy-five people across multiple shifts.
I've sat across the table from registrar auditors who had every reason to write findings — and helped organizations walk out of those rooms with clean results. I've written corrective action responses for customer complaints serious enough to threaten contracts, and I've seen what happens when a response describes the symptom instead of the cause.
The most important work often happens on the floor, not in the documentation. Taking technicians who had never heard of a quality standard and helping them understand why it matters for the part in their hands — that translation from document to practice is where most QMS implementations either take hold or quietly fall apart.
AS9100 Rev D remains the backbone of what I do. ISO 9001 forms the foundation beneath it. When the IA9100 transition comes — and it will — I'll be ready to support organizations through the revision the same way I've guided clients through every previous cycle.
AS9100 is not a side practice — it is the practice. Nearly 30 years of aerospace QMS experience means knowing where organizations consistently struggle: risk-based thinking that stays theoretical, operational planning that never connects to the shop floor, management reviews that generate action items no one tracks. I've seen and fixed all of it.
ISO 9001 forms the foundation beneath AS9100 and stands on its own as a certification path for organizations not yet serving aerospace customers with AS9100 requirements. I've guided organizations through both standards in tandem for years — building ISO 9001 systems that are structurally ready for AS9100 upgrade when the time comes.
Most corrective action failures come from one place: the response describes the symptom, not the cause. I've worked with the 5-Why methodology long enough to know where the logic breaks down — and what a valid root cause actually looks like under registrar scrutiny. In aerospace, the 3-Legged 5-Why adds discipline to that process for the most consequential nonconformances.
AS9100 Rev D is transitioning to IA9100 (estimated early 2027 — not yet confirmed by IAQG). ISO 9001:2015 is transitioning to ISO 9001:2026 (estimated Fall 2026 — not yet confirmed by ISO). There is significant misinformation circulating about both transitions. I'm tracking both closely and am a qualified resource for organizations that want accurate guidance, not noise.
Every implementation I've run has hit the same walls in the same places. Not because organizations are careless — but because the tools available to small shops weren't built for small shops.
I built the QMS tool suite because I got tired of watching the same problems slow down every implementation. The tools exist because I know exactly where the pain is. This isn't a technology experiment. It's three decades of pattern recognition built into something you can actually use.
Intelligent automation is applied where it genuinely reduces the burden of expert judgment — root cause validation, audit risk assessment, compliance posture analysis. Where it doesn't add value or would add audit risk, it's deliberately absent. Knowing the difference is the expertise.
The 5-Why is the right methodology. But without validation, "why" chains terminate at symptoms rather than causes — and the corrective action addresses the wrong problem. The CAR + Root Cause Tool builds that validation into the workflow.
An internal audit should build on the last one — not begin with a blank page. The Audit Planning Tool generates company-specific questions based on your actual processes and past findings, so each audit is smarter than the one before it.
A calibration schedule that lives in a spreadsheet is a schedule that slips. The Calibration Manager runs the schedule automatically, flags what's overdue, and produces the register your registrar will ask to see.
Training happens continuously — but the records don't get captured that way. The Training Manager captures requirements and completions as they occur, so the matrix is always current rather than always reconstructed.
A special process requirement buried in a purchase order note field. A first article inspection that wasn't flagged at order entry. The Customer Requirements Flow-Down Tool catches these before they reach the floor — and before they reach the customer.
Every call, every deliverable, every question — Clayton Kuehl. No account managers. No junior staff who've never seen a registrar audit. The experience you're paying for is the experience you get, from the first conversation to the final audit.
Most of my work is done remotely — document review, advisory calls, audit preparation, tool configuration. I come on-site for gap assessments and when being on the floor genuinely adds value that a video call can't. Based in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. Serving organizations nationwide.
Certification implementation doesn't stop production. Engagements are structured around your calendar and your team's capacity — not around a consulting firm's project timeline. If a critical production run takes priority, the QMS work adjusts. That's how it should work.
A free 30-minute call is how every engagement starts. Tell me where you are, what you're trying to accomplish, and what you've already tried. I'll give you a straight answer about whether I can help — and what that would look like.
No pitch. No obligation.